Manatal Competitors & Alternatives in 2026: Real Per-User Costs
The right Manatal alternatives depend on what you want to change: per-user pricing that scales cleanly, deeper AI scoring and sourcing, agency CRM and client billing, or a simpler plan for an in-house team.
Manatal itself publishes numeric per-user pricing across three self-serve tiers, so a useful comparison should weigh that against alternatives that are either equally transparent or fully quote-based.
Disclosure: 100Hires publishes this guide and is included as one of the options. We reviewed official vendor pricing and product pages on July 21, 2026.
Prices can change, so use the linked vendor page to confirm the quote, billing term, user count, job limits, and add-ons that apply to your team. We intentionally do not reuse marketplace star ratings because their scores and review counts change frequently.
What Manatal offers today
The hiring playbook, in your inbox
One email a week - benchmarks, AI screening tactics, and short interview templates from the 100Hires team. No product pitches.
Manatal's current pricing page lists three self-serve, per-user tiers billed annually, plus a fourth custom tier.
Professional is $15 per user per month (annual) or $19 monthly, and includes up to 15 jobs per account, up to 10,000 candidates, and unlimited hiring managers.
Enterprise is $35 per user per month (annual) or $39 monthly, and adds unlimited jobs, unlimited candidates, and workflow automation.
Enterprise Plus is $55 per user per month (annual) or $59 monthly, and adds an advanced report builder, ChatGPT, Claude, and LLM integration, the Manatal Open API, single sign-on, and priority support.
A Custom plan above that is quote-based and adds a dedicated account manager and phone support. All three self-serve tiers include a 14-day free trial with no card required.
An alternative is worth considering when another product better matches your buying process, AI needs, or operating model, whether that is an in-house hiring team, a staffing agency, or an executive search firm.
What Manatal actually costs
Manatal publishes per-user rates, which puts it in a minority in this category. Figures from Manatal's pricing page, checked on 25 July 2026.
| Plan | Billed annually | Billed monthly | Job limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional | $15 per user per month | $19 per user per month | Up to 15 jobs per user |
| Enterprise | $35 per user per month | Higher monthly rate | Unlimited jobs |
| Enterprise Plus | $55 per user per month | Higher monthly rate | Unlimited, plus compliance and reporting |
At $15 per user per month, Manatal is the cheapest genuine applicant tracking system with a public price in this market. A three-recruiter agency on Professional pays $540 a year. The same team on Enterprise pays $1,260.
Reviews back the value story: 4.8 on G2 across roughly 147 reviews and 4.6 on Capterra across about 141, with customer service rated 4.7.
What is gated behind which tier
The escalator is not arbitrary. Manatal's own documentation places specific capabilities on specific tiers, and these four decide whether the entry price is real for your team.
- Multi-step workflow automations are Enterprise and above. The $15 Professional plan has none, so any evaluation that assumes automation at the entry price is wrong.
- Fifteen open positions is a hard cap on Professional. The vendor's own guidance is that Professional suits teams with fewer than 15 open roles.
- SSO, user groups, API access, priority support and beta features are Enterprise Plus only. Open API sits on the $55 per user tier alone, which matters for anyone planning integrations.
- LLM and ChatGPT integration is also Enterprise Plus.
The practical consequence is easy to miss when comparing sticker prices: pricing is per user, so cost compounds with team size, and the features an in-house team typically needs, automations plus API, sit on the most expensive tier.
Manatal's entry price is genuinely the lowest here. The configuration most teams actually need is not.
The complaint that follows the price
Recruiters are consistent about Manatal in a way that is genuinely useful: excellent value at entry, strain as you grow.
From an r/Recruitment thread comparing Manatal with Recruit CRM:
Their verdict: the cheapest real applicant tracking system available and strong value at that price, with the caveat that it does not hold up as well once a team starts to grow.
A second comment in the same thread is more specific about where the limits are:
Their more specific read: performance can feel slow, candidate management and its automation are genuinely good, and sourcing, contact enrichment and bulk email are the weak areas.
And from a solo recruiter comparing it with Zoho Recruit, a warning about how the bill behaves as you add capability:
Their comparison with Zoho: Manatal is the more streamlined product, but the cost escalates sharply as features are added, to the point they described it as unrealistic.
That last point deserves context rather than repetition. Moving from Professional to Enterprise is $15 to $35 per user, which is a 2.3-fold increase, and Enterprise Plus is $55. For a ten-seat agency that is the difference between $1,800 and $6,600 a year.
The entry price is genuinely low; the escalator is steep.
So the honest test before you shortlist anything: work out which tier you will be on in twelve months, not which one you are buying today. Manatal's advantage is largest at the bottom of its own range.
Manatal alternatives at a glance
| Alternative | Use case | Pricing approach | Trial access |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loxo | Executive search and staffing teams that want a free CRM tier to start | Free plan; paid from $169/user/month | Free plan, no time limit |
| Bullhorn | Growing agencies that want an app marketplace and AI automation add-ons | Anchor prices shown, quote confirmed at checkout | Demo; self-serve trial not stated |
| Ceipal | Staffing and GCC teams that want ATS plus vendor management combined | Custom quote | Self-guided tour; pricing by demo |
| Crelate | Agencies that want a modular AI recruiting platform priced with add-ons | Per-user tiers plus custom add-ons | Contact sales; self-serve trial not stated |
| Avionte | Larger staffing agencies that want ATS, CRM, payroll, and billing together | Custom quote | Demo required |
| JobAdder | Agencies that want a tailored proposal across three feature tiers | Custom quote | Free demo |
| JobDiva | Staffing agencies that want an established ATS with VMS integrations | Custom quote, sales-only | Demo or RFP |
| Recruiterflow | Search firms that want ATS, CRM, and AI agents in one plan | Published per-user Platform plan; AI add-on custom | Demo booking |
| Access Vincere Evo (formerly Vincere) | Agencies already using Access Group products, or wanting modular AI add-ons | Custom, modular pricing | Contact sales |
| 100Hires | SMBs and in-house teams that want public pricing and AI in every plan | Public pricing | 14 days, no card |
How we evaluated these alternatives
- Buyer fit: in-house corporate hiring, recruitment agency, staffing firm, or executive search.
- Pricing visibility: published per-user numbers, an anchor price that still routes to a quote, or a fully custom quote.
- Plan constraints: job limits, candidate limits, seat counts, and which tier unlocks AI.
- Workflow: sourcing, CRM and client management, screening, scheduling, automation, and reporting.
- AI scope: what the vendor documents, which plan includes it, and what remains an add-on.
- Switching readiness: exports, imports, API access, and migration support.
Before choosing any ATS, test one real role from application through disposition. Confirm candidate exports, email behavior, permissions, reports, support coverage, and the total price for your actual team size.
A low anchor price is not comparable if the final quote excludes the job volume, seats, or AI features you need.
Nine more independent Manatal alternatives worth knowing
1. Loxo: for teams that want to start free and scale into AI agents
Loxo offers a free-forever plan with an applicant tracking system, recruiting CRM, Loxo Boost, one user, and unlimited jobs and projects.
Basic is $169 per user per month billed annually and adds a sales CRM, organic job board posting, multiple users, custom dashboards, and reporting.
Professional and Enterprise layer on Loxo Source, natural language search, an AI notetaker, AI agents, and Loxo Outreach, all priced through a sales conversation.
- Why shortlist it: a genuine free tier to start, then a clear path into an AI-heavy talent intelligence platform.
- Check before buying: the free plan is capped at one user, and Loxo's AI agents and outreach automation only appear on the custom-quoted Professional and Enterprise tiers.
2. Bullhorn: for growing agencies that want a large integration marketplace
Bullhorn shows an anchor Starter price of $99 per user per month and Core at $165 per user per month, both routed through a "get a quote" step rather than instant checkout.
Its Pro tier and AI Digital Worker add-ons, branded Bullhorn Amplify, are fully custom-quoted and cover skills such as candidate matching, screening, and submission-packet automation.
- Why shortlist it: a 350+ partner app marketplace, native LinkedIn integrations, and a growing set of AI Digital Worker skills.
- Check before buying: get the full written quote before comparing to the anchor price, and confirm which Amplify AI skills are bundled versus billed as add-ons.
3. Ceipal: for staffing and GCC teams that want ATS plus vendor management
Ceipal does not publish numeric pricing. Its pricing URL routes to a self-guided product tour instead, with separate General Staffing, Healthcare, Corporate, and GCC editions, each pairing an ATS with a Vendor Management System and Ceipal AI matching.
- Why shortlist it: a combined ATS and VMS with vertical-specific editions and AI matching built in.
- Check before buying: request an itemized quote per module and per edition, since every price is negotiated rather than published.
4. Crelate: for agencies that want a modular platform priced with add-ons
Crelate starts with Essentials at $85 per user per month billed annually, covering ATS, CRM, a job portal, resume parsing, and sourcing for up to two users and 20,000 contacts.
Business is $119 per user per month and adds an AI assistant, client and team portals, and email connections. Business Plus and its platform or usage-based add-ons (data sync, additional AI agents, MCP and webhooks) are custom-quoted.
- Why shortlist it: published per-user pricing with an AI assistant available from the Business tier up.
- Check before buying: Essentials caps out at two users, and several AI and integration add-ons are priced separately.
5. Avionte: for larger staffing agencies that want ATS, CRM, payroll, and billing together
Avionte no longer publishes a pricing page; every plan is quoted through a sales conversation.
Its platform combines ATS and CRM, payroll and billing, AI and automation, API and integrations, a mobile talent app, and business intelligence in one suite aimed at established staffing agencies.
- Why shortlist it: a single suite that covers front-office recruiting and back-office payroll and billing.
- Check before buying: budget for implementation fees on top of the subscription, and confirm which AI and automation modules are included versus billed separately.
6. JobAdder: for agencies that want a tailored proposal across three tiers
JobAdder replaced its published per-user pricing with a "request pricing" page.
Its three tiers, Recruiter Lite, Recruiter Essential, and Recruiter Pro, are differentiated by feature set rather than by public price points.
The split includes Adder Intelligence (smart summaries, smart sync, and smart job descriptions) from Essential up, and Roi-AI-powered automation on Pro.
- Why shortlist it: a clear feature ladder across three named tiers, with temp and contract management built in.
- Check before buying: ask for the same feature comparison shown on the marketing page and get the full annual total in writing before assuming Lite pricing.
7. JobDiva: for staffing agencies that want an established ATS with VMS integrations
JobDiva does not publish a pricing page. Its site routes prospects toward a live demo, an ebook, or a formal RFP submission rather than self-serve pricing.
- Why shortlist it: a long operating history in staffing, with VMS and job-board integrations for high-volume recruiting.
- Check before buying: request pricing in writing early in the process, since there is no public reference point to sanity-check a quote against.
8. Recruiterflow: for search firms that want ATS, CRM, and AI agents in one plan
Recruiterflow's current Platform Plan is $149 per user per month, covering ATS and CRM, multichannel sequences, recruitment and sales automation, client and team access control, Chrome extension sourcing, and API access.
Its AIRA Plan layers on a set of named AI agents, including a notetaker, matchmaker, job-change alerts, and a submission agent, at custom pricing.
- Why shortlist it: a single published per-user price with a broad automation baseline, plus an opt-in AI agent suite.
- Check before buying: confirm whether the specific AI agents you need ship on Platform or require the AIRA upgrade.
9. Access Vincere Evo (formerly Vincere): for agencies already using Access Group products
Vincere is now marketed as Access Vincere Evo, part of The Access Group.
Its pricing page returned a browser block during this review and could not be fetched directly, so no specific figure is quoted here; agencies should request a current quote and confirm which modules, including its AI Smart Packs, are bundled versus billed separately.
- Why shortlist it: a consolidated CRM, ATS, and automation platform under Access Group's wider HR and finance suite.
- Check before buying: the rebrand changed the pricing structure, so any quote or figure based on the old Vincere plan names may be out of date.
Manatal Chrome extension vs 100Hires
Manatal and 100Hires both offer broad profile capture, so this comparison is less about whether they support LinkedIn and more about which sites, import controls, and follow-up system match the team's workflow.
| Capability | Manatal People-Match AI extension | 100Hires Chrome extension |
|---|---|---|
| Core sourcing | Supports LinkedIn and LinkedIn Recruiter | Supports LinkedIn as part of 14 named sourcing sites |
| Additional sites | Beta support includes GitHub, SEEK, Indeed, XING, Monster, Dice, SeekOut, hireEZ, Apollo, Handshake, OCC Mundial, and Liepin | Also supports GitHub and Indeed, plus Gmail, AngelList, Stack Overflow, Behance, Medium, Facebook, X, Meetup, Upwork, and Dribbble |
| Import control | Can assign a candidate to a job or folder, add notes, and choose Quick Parse or a more complete profile capture | Adds the candidate to a selected job and pipeline stage, records the source, and can update an existing record |
| Contact enrichment | Manatal's extension documentation focuses on profile parsing rather than promising hidden email or phone discovery | Visible data is captured during import; hidden email and phone enrichment is a separate Pro workflow using a connected provider |
| Follow-up | The candidate continues into Manatal's ATS and CRM workflow | The candidate continues into 100Hires outreach, scheduling, evaluation, and pipeline collaboration |
Manatal is attractive for recruiters who source heavily from its beta job-board and talent-platform list and value its quick-versus-full parsing control.
100Hires is a better match for teams sourcing across email, developer communities, and social networks that want explicit source and stage handling.
See the 100Hires Chrome extension for recruiters and its complete list of supported sites.
Manatal alternatives feature and pricing comparison
This table summarizes vendor-published information checked on July 21, 2026. "Custom quote" means the vendor's pricing page did not advertise a self-serve number; it does not prove the option is unavailable through sales.
| Product | Pricing snapshot | AI access | Trial or key limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manatal | $15 to $55/user/month (annual), plus a custom tier | ChatGPT, Claude, and LLM integration on Enterprise Plus | 14-day trial, no card |
| Loxo | Free plan; paid from $169/user/month | AI agents and Loxo Outreach on custom-quoted tiers | Free plan; no self-serve time limit |
| Bullhorn | Anchor prices from $99/user/month, quote confirmed | Bullhorn Amplify AI Digital Workers, custom-quoted | Demo; self-serve trial not stated |
| Ceipal | Custom quote | Ceipal AI across editions | Self-guided tour; pricing by demo |
| Crelate | $85 to $119/user/month, plus custom add-ons | AI Assistant from the Business tier up | Contact sales; self-serve trial not stated |
| Avionte | Custom quote | AI and automation module, custom-quoted | Demo required |
| JobAdder | Custom quote across three named tiers | Adder Intelligence from Essential up | Free demo |
| JobDiva | Custom quote, no public pricing page | Not publicly detailed | Demo or RFP |
| Recruiterflow | $149/user/month Platform Plan; AIRA custom | AIRA AI agent suite, custom-quoted | Demo booking |
| Access Vincere Evo | Custom, modular pricing; page not directly accessible | AI Smart Packs (per vendor's own marketing copy) | Contact sales |
| 100Hires | $49/month (Start, annual) | AI Score and AI Copilot in every plan | 14-day trial, no card |
What the review base ranks as the real limits
Aggregated review mining across both major review sites puts two complaints well ahead of everything else, and both are about flexibility rather than price.
- Limited customisation. Interface, career pages, email templates and reports. Reviewers want more control than the product gives.
- Search limitations. Specifically finding archived candidates and using boolean queries, which is a meaningful constraint for anyone building a reusable talent pool.
Set against that, the top-rated strength is workflow simplification, which is consistent with the streamlined description above. This is a product that is easy to run and hard to bend.
Our verdict
If you are on Professional and staying there, nothing here beats it on price. $15 per user per month for a working applicant tracking system with a 4.8 G2 rating is the floor of this market. Do not migrate to save money you are not spending.
If you are being pushed to Enterprise by the 15-job limit, do the arithmetic across all seats. At three seats the jump is trivial. At ten or more it is thousands a year, and that is the point where flat-rate products become competitive.
If sourcing and enrichment are the gap, that matches what users report. Recruiters describe those specific features as limited. Adding a dedicated sourcing tool alongside Manatal is often cheaper than moving to a platform that bundles both.
If you are an agency growing past a handful of desks, plan the exit before you need it. The consistent recruiter view is that Manatal strains with scale. Knowing your migration path in advance is cheaper than discovering it during a growth quarter.
Where 100Hires is the wrong choice
The section below discloses that 100Hires is our product, so here is the other side of it plainly.
- You want the lowest possible price. Manatal Professional at $15 per user per month is cheaper than our $49 monthly entry for a one or two-person team. We are not going to argue otherwise.
- You are an agency placing candidates with clients. Manatal is built for that and we are not. Client accounts, submittals and placement tracking belong in an agency CRM such as Recruit CRM, Loxo or Crelate.
- You need recruitment CRM features for business development. Selling into client accounts is a different workflow from in-house hiring.
- You are billing per placement. Margin and commission tracking are agency-system features.
- You need multi-language support across many markets. Manatal's international coverage is broader than ours.
Where we fit is in-house teams, not agencies. If you are hiring for your own company and the per-user meter is what pushed you here, see 100Hires pricing or start a free trial.
When staying with Manatal can make sense
A switch is not automatically the right answer.
Manatal may remain a strong fit when its Professional or Enterprise tier already covers your job and candidate volume, you value its published per-user pricing, or your team specifically wants ChatGPT, Claude, and LLM integration alongside its Open API on Enterprise Plus.
Before moving, compare the cost of migration, retraining, integrations, historical reports, and candidate communication continuity against the measurable benefit you expect from a new system. Ask both vendors to demonstrate the same job, workflow, report, and export scenario.
100Hires: a disclosed option for SMBs comparing public pricing and AI-supported workflows
100Hires is worth comparing when your team wants public pricing and AI inside day-to-day ATS work, without the agency-CRM overhead that several Manatal alternatives are built around.
Current features include job-specific AI candidate scoring, AI Copilot, AI-assisted email writing, sourcing tools with Contact Finder enrichment, nurture campaigns, pipeline automation, interview scheduling, and reporting.
Plans start at $49 per month (Start, billed annually). A 14-day trial is available without a credit card. The Advanced plan is $199 per month for unlimited jobs, candidates, and users, and the Pro plan is $399 per month and adds the full sourcing and contact-enrichment toolset.
If you already intend to move, the Manatal migration guide covers export, test import, field mapping, and validation.
What to verify before migrating from Manatal
- Export scope: candidates, applications, resumes, attachments, jobs, notes, tags, custom fields, stage history, and communication records.
- Field mapping: decide which values become candidate fields, application fields, tags, stages, or archived notes.
- Record relationships: verify candidates linked to multiple jobs and duplicate-handling rules.
- Integration cutover: plan email, calendar, job-board, and API connections used by your current workflow.
- Seat and job reconciliation: confirm your new user count and job volume against the destination plan's limits.
- Test import: import a small sample first and reconcile record counts, attachments, fields, and searchability.
- Acceptance criteria: assign an owner to approve data quality before the old account is retired.
Manatal alternatives FAQ
What is Manatal and who is it built for?
Manatal is a cloud-based recruitment ATS and CRM aimed at agencies, in-house teams, and staffing companies, with tiered per-user pricing and features like Chrome sourcing, AI-assisted parsing, and an open API on its top tier. 100Hires is a Manatal alternative built around AI candidate scoring, sourcing, and nurture in every plan, so comparing the two on pricing and AI scope is worthwhile before renewing or switching.
How much does Manatal cost?
Manatal's Professional plan starts at $15 per user per month billed annually ($19 monthly), Enterprise is $35 per user per month annually, and Enterprise Plus is $55 per user per month annually with ChatGPT, Claude, and LLM integration plus single sign-on. All three include a 14-day free trial with no card required. 100Hires publishes similar transparency, starting at $49 per month (Start, annual) with its own 14-day trial and no card required.
Which Manatal alternatives publish numeric pricing?
100Hires, Loxo (a free plan plus a published Basic tier), Crelate, and Recruiterflow each publish at least one numeric price. Bullhorn shows anchor prices but confirms the final number by quote. Ceipal, Avionte, JobAdder, JobDiva, and Access Vincere Evo (formerly Vincere) are quote-only. Always confirm the current total on the vendor's own pricing page.
Does 100Hires have AI features comparable to Manatal?
Manatal's ChatGPT, Claude, and LLM integration is limited to its top Enterprise Plus plan. 100Hires includes AI candidate scoring and AI Copilot in every plan, along with sourcing tools and Contact Finder enrichment, plus nurture campaigns and workflow automation.
Which alternative fits recruitment agencies best?
Loxo, Bullhorn, Ceipal, Crelate, Avionte, JobAdder, JobDiva, Recruiterflow, and Access Vincere Evo (formerly Vincere) are all built primarily around agency and staffing workflows. 100Hires is designed for in-house teams and SMB hiring, so agencies with heavy client-billing needs should weigh those agency-first products against 100Hires' simpler, transparent pricing.
Can Manatal data be migrated to another ATS?
Migration feasibility depends on the export Manatal provides and the fields your destination ATS accepts. If you plan to move to 100Hires, the Manatal migration guide covers export, field mapping, test import, and validation before you retire the old account.
Is Vincere still called Vincere?
No. As of 2026, Vincere is marketed as Access Vincere Evo under The Access Group, and its pricing structure changed alongside the rebrand, so a quote based on the old Vincere plan names may be out of date. 100Hires keeps the same plan names and public pricing over time, which removes the need to repeat quote-checking.
How should I compare ATS pricing across these alternatives?
Compare the annual total for your actual seat count, job volume, candidate volume, AI usage, and required add-ons, not just the advertised starting price. 100Hires publishes its full plan breakdown on its pricing page so you can model the total before requesting quotes from quote-only vendors like Ceipal or Avionte.
Manatal, Loxo, Bullhorn, Ceipal, Crelate, Avionte, JobAdder, JobDiva, Recruiterflow, and Access Vincere Evo are trademarks of their respective owners. 100Hires is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of these companies.
Product names are used only to identify the services being compared.
Try 100Hires for free
No credit card. 14-day trial. Forbes Advisor #1 ATS for SMBs.
