Are you feeling bogged down by CareerPlug's limited mass messaging functionality, time-consuming navigation, or complex initial setup? Or perhaps you're seeking more customization for multi-unit use, improved scheduling, and advanced reporting features? Maybe you need more location filtering options, Spanish language support, or a handy mobile app? If any of these resonate with you, it's time to consider CareerPlug alternatives.

CareerPlug Alternatives

100Hires

Attract, interview & hire
the best candidates faster

Tony Urban, CEO at Deckrobot, 11-50 employees

Overall Rating

5/5

Likelihood to Recommend

10/10

I've front loaded all my recruiting needs to 100hires :) Very intuitive to use. I'm not an HR person, thus, for me it's crucial that the tool is straight-forward to use yet powerful! Additionally, I really like that publishing job at 100hires automatically promotes it and gets you additional candidate leads

Powerful Applicant Tracking System with G Suite integration

Get 100Hires FREE

Get started for FREE, upgrade as you grow Easy setup No credit card required

100Hires

100Hires is a very popular ATS among small and mid-sized companies, it holds numerous G2 badges, including 'Leader' in Recruitment Marketing and Candidate Relationship Management, 'Most Implementable' for Small-Business and Mid-Market, and 'Best Usability' across multiple categories. Ready to experience 100Hires? Get a demo or start your free trial today to see how 100Hires can optimize your hiring process. For more information on plans and options, check out our pricing page.

G2 rating: 4.8/5 based on 831 reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.9/5 based on 742 reviews.

1. Increased Applicant Reach:

• Post to major job boards (Indeed, LinkedIn, Glassdoor, etc.) with a single click, expanding job visibility and attracting more top talent.
• Real-time tracking and analytics allow clients to monitor job posting performance and optimize recruitment strategies.

2. Streamlined Recruitment Process:

• Centralized candidate data with easy access to interaction history and candidate statuses.
• Reduces duplicate communication and enhances the candidate experience.

3. Time Savings with AI:

• AI-generated job descriptions, application forms, and interview questions reduce time spent on resume screening.
• AI-driven candidate ranking helps prioritize the best candidates quickly.

4. Automation for Efficiency:

• Integrated scheduling with Google or Outlook calendars, knockout questions, duplicate detection, and automated communications (notifications, follow-ups) reduce manual effort.
• Zapier integration allows seamless connectivity with third-party tools.

100Hires Pricing:

100Hires offers three pricing tiers: Start at $75/month (billed annually) for companies with minimal hiring needs, supporting up to 3 jobs and 1 user. The Advanced plan, at $199/month, includes unlimited jobs, candidates, and users, plus features like automated emails and a custom domain. The Pro plan, at $399/month, adds advanced sourcing tools, contact enrichment, and onboarding support, ideal for sourcing passive candidates.

Elevatus

Elevatus, founded in 2019, is an applicant tracking system based in Jordan that raised $10.5 million.

G2 rating: 5/5 based on 3 reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.8/5 based on 77 reviews.

Elevatus's typical customers are primarily based in Saudi Arabia (64.29%), with smaller shares in the United States (4.29%), France (2.76%), Egypt (2.5%), and the United Kingdom (2.29%). Key industries include Hospital & Health Care (13%), Information Technology and Services (10%), Food & Beverages (8%), Financial Services (6%), and Telecommunications (5%).

According to G2, 66.7% of customers have more than 1000 employees, and 33.3% have 51-1000 employees. Capterra reviews show 26% of customers with 51-200 employees, with smaller shares across other size categories.

Elevatus Pricing:

Elevatus EVA-REC offers paid subscriptions starting at $143 per month, with a free trial available for users to test the software before committing to a subscription. Pricing is based on a per-feature model.

Elevatus Pros:

• User-Friendly Interface and Ease of Use (mentioned 15 times): Users appreciate Elevatus for its intuitive, user-friendly interface, making it easy to navigate and manage the hiring process without extensive training.
• Efficient Candidate Management and Centralized Tracking (mentioned 12 times): The platform centralizes candidate information, enabling users to track candidates seamlessly through all stages of the hiring process in one place.
• AI-Driven Screening and Automation (mentioned 10 times): Elevatus leverages AI to screen and rank candidates, automating repetitive tasks, which saves time and allows hiring managers to focus on high-priority activities.

Elevatus Cons:

• Limited Reporting and Analytics Capabilities (mentioned 4 times): Users desire more dynamic and robust reporting features, especially in terms of business intelligence insights and detailed analytics.
• Lacks Full AI and Data Mining Potential (mentioned 3 times): Some users feel the tool could further develop its AI features, such as advanced data mining and digital footprint analysis, to compete with other solutions.
• Minor Technical Issues and Errors (mentioned 3 times): Occasionally, users encounter small errors, particularly in specific stages like video assessments, though these are generally resolved quickly.
• Slight Learning Curve for New Users (mentioned 3 times): Beginners may find it slightly challenging to use certain features initially; however, support is available to help with onboarding.
• Desire for More Candidate Tracking History (mentioned 2 times): Users would appreciate a feature that retains historical records of the candidate stages for improved tracking.
• Need for Additional Language Options (mentioned 2 times): While Elevatus supports several languages, some users would like additional languages, such as Hungarian.
• Small User Interface Elements (mentioned 2 times): Some users find the icons and font size too small, making it slightly challenging to read.
• Lacks Flexibility in Search Options (mentioned 2 times): Users would like enhanced search functionality, such as more flexible keyword or word search options.
• Initial Limited Branding Customization (Since Resolved) (mentioned 1 time): Some users initially wanted more branding options, which were later added by the Elevatus team.
• No Significant Cons Noted (mentioned 12 times): Many users report no significant cons, finding the system highly effective and intuitive, often exceeding their expectations.

KeldairHR

KeldairHR, founded in 2007, is an applicant tracking system.

G2 rating: /5 based on reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.6/5 based on 125 reviews.

KeldairHR's typical customers are entirely based in the United States. Key industries include Medical Practice (45%), Philanthropy (11%), Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing (9%), Construction (5%), and Hospital & Health Care (5%).

Company size distribution from Capterra reviews shows that 8.8% of customers with 51-200 employees, with smaller shares across other size categories.

KeldairHR Pricing:

KeldairHR charges based on the number of open job positions, offering unlimited users, core features, applicants, and storage. Pricing starts at $299/month for up to 5 open jobs, $499/month for 10, $799/month for 20, and $1,049/month for 30, with an annual agreement. For more than 30 open jobs, custom pricing is available.

KeldairHR Pros:

• Ease of Use and User-Friendly Interface (mentioned 6 times): Users appreciate the intuitive and user-friendly design of KeldairHR, making it easy for both HR professionals and hiring managers to navigate and use the system effectively.
• Customizable Virtual Interview and Screening Tools (mentioned 5 times): Users enjoy the customizable pre-interview questions and virtual interview options, which allow them to evaluate candidates before the in-person interview stage.
• Time-Saving Capabilities (mentioned 4 times): The tool is highly valued for its efficiency in filtering unqualified applicants, which saves considerable time in the hiring process.

KeldairHR Cons:

• Time-Consuming Job Creation Process (mentioned 2 times): Users find it takes significant time to create new jobs in the system, which can be a challenge, especially for new managers or employees unfamiliar with the process.
• Lack of Detailed Reporting (mentioned 1 time): Some users would appreciate more comprehensive and detailed reporting options within the system.
• Resume Auto-Parsing Limitations (mentioned 1 time): Users are looking forward to updates that will automatically parse resumes to fill in work history, which is currently a manual task.
• Technical Issues Due to Cache and Cookies (mentioned 1 time): Applicants can encounter technical problems if cache and cookies are not cleared on their computers, which disrupts their experience.
• Occasional Data Processing Issues (mentioned 1 time): Users report intermittent data processing problems, though support is quick and thorough in resolving these issues.
• Responsive but Awaited Updates (mentioned 1 time): While KeldairHR is responsive to feedback, users are eager for specific improvements, particularly with resume auto-parsing.
• None Noted (mentioned several times): Multiple responses did not note any significant dislikes, indicating satisfaction with the product overall.

ATSOnDemand

ATSOnDemand, founded in 2002, is an applicant tracking system.

G2 rating: 5/5 based on 2 reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.2/5 based on 65 reviews.

ATSOnDemand's typical customers are primarily based in the United States (98.26%), with smaller shares in Canada (0.84%), India (0.72%), Brazil (0.14%), and Mexico (0.04%). Key industries include Banking (12%), Hospital & Health Care (8%), Non-Profit Organization Management (8%), Philanthropy (8%), and Primary/Secondary Education (6%).

According to G2, 50% of customers have fewer than 50 employees, and 50% have more than 1000. Capterra reviews show 18.5% having 51-200 employees, with smaller shares across other size categories.

ATSOnDemand Pricing:

ATS OnDemand is a cloud-based Applicant Tracking System that operates on a ""Pay As You Grow"" model, with a starting price of $1.00 per month. While a free trial is available for users to test the software, there is no free version offered.

ATSOnDemand Pros:

• Ease of Use and Navigation (mentioned 9 times): Users appreciate ATS OnDemand's straightforward interface, making it simple to post jobs, track applicants, and navigate the system efficiently.
• Effective Customer Support (mentioned 8 times): The responsive and helpful customer service team is highly valued, with users noting quick resolutions and assistance.
• Customization Options (mentioned 7 times): The tool's customization features are well-regarded, allowing adjustments in job postings, workflows, and templates to suit specific organizational needs.

ATSOnDemand Cons:

• Difficult Reporting Configuration (mentioned 6 times): Users find the reporting feature challenging to configure for custom reports, requiring a high level of technical skill for non-standard reporting needs.
• Onboarding Process Issues (mentioned 5 times): The onboarding tool is difficult to use, with outdated fields and unnecessary steps, making it cumbersome to transfer candidates to onboarding after hiring.
• Clunky Scheduling Feature (mentioned 3 times): Users report that the scheduling tool feels awkward to use and could benefit from refinements to improve ease and reliability.
• Complexity Due to High Customization (mentioned 3 times): While customization options are appreciated, they can make the tool feel cluttered and overwhelming, especially for users who do not need all available options.
• Lack of CRM Functionality (mentioned 2 times): The absence of a CRM component makes it difficult for users who manage candidate pipelines, limiting the tool's usefulness for ongoing candidate engagement.
• Inadequate Calendar Integration (mentioned 2 times): The lack of seamless calendar integration, especially with Outlook, frustrates users who need to schedule efficiently and manage appointments.
• Difficult to Update Candidate Information in Bulk (mentioned 2 times): Users find it time-consuming to update candidate information or modify questions in bulk, increasing the effort needed to make system-wide changes.
• Steep Learning Curve (mentioned 2 times): The system requires a significant time investment and multiple training sessions to fully understand and use all functionalities effectively.
• Outdated Technology and Interface (mentioned 2 times): Some users feel the interface is outdated and not intuitive, leading to a longer time to complete simple tasks.
• Overwhelming Portal for Newcomers (mentioned 2 times): The portal can appear overwhelming and disorganized, especially for new users, making initial navigation and usage challenging.

Softgarden

Softgarden, founded in 2001, is an applicant tracking system based in Germany that raised €3 million, acquired absence.io, and was acquired by Grupa Pracuj.

G2 rating: 4.6/5 based on 4 reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.6/5 based on 121 reviews.

Softgarden's typical customers are primarily based in Germany (64.81%), with smaller shares in Switzerland (10.58%), the United States (5.54%), Austria (3.9%), and the United Kingdom (3.56%). Key industries include Information Technology and Services (13%), Wholesale (5%), Renewables & Environment (5%), Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing (4%), and Health, Wellness and Fitness (4%).

According to G2, 50% of customers have 51-1000 employees, 25% have fewer than 50 employees, and 25% have more than 1000. Capterra reviews show 28.9% of customers with 51-200 employees, with smaller shares across other size categories.

Softgarden Pricing:

Softgarden offers pricing starting from €99 per month, suitable for companies of all sizes and industries. They provide a Talent Acquisition Suite with a 14-day free trial available for new users. Based on recent analysis, Softgarden's pricing can also start at $74, with options for annual, monthly, or quote-based billing.

Softgarden Pros:

• User-Friendly Interface and Easy Navigation (mentioned 15 times): Users appreciate softgarden’s intuitive and simple interface, which is easy for both frequent and occasional users to navigate without extensive training.
• Excellent Customer Support (mentioned 12 times): The customer service team is praised for being responsive, friendly, and effective, resolving issues quickly through live chat, email, and personal support.
• Efficient Recruitment Workflow and Automation (mentioned 10 times): softgarden helps streamline recruitment processes by automating tasks like resume parsing, email notifications, and application tracking, saving users considerable time.

Softgarden Cons:

• Limited Customization of Templates and Layouts (mentioned 8 times): Users report limitations in customizing email templates, job ad layouts, and macros, often requiring additional support or costs for personalized features.
• High Costs for Certain Features (mentioned 7 times): Some users find the pricing structure expensive, especially for basic upgrades and specific functionalities that may not justify the additional cost.
• User Interface and Navigation Challenges (mentioned 6 times): The interface can be initially complex, with some functions and settings feeling hidden or unintuitive, though users adapt with time and customer support assistance.
• Inconsistent Email Functionality (mentioned 5 times): The email functionality, including sending emails directly from the system and managing email templates, is seen as less intuitive and could be improved.
• Workflow and Automation Limitations (mentioned 5 times): Users desire more flexibility in workflows, including adding or editing steps in recruitment processes, especially when deviating from standard flows.
• Limited Filtering and Search Options (mentioned 4 times): Users would like more filtering and search capabilities, particularly for navigating rejected candidates or finding specific jobs efficiently.
• Technical Issues and Frequent Updates (mentioned 4 times): Occasional technical problems and frequent updates requiring adjustments are noted, which can impact smooth usage.
• Basic Reporting and Data Transparency (mentioned 3 times): The reporting features could be more transparent and robust, with comparative values and clearer data extraction options for custom analysis.
• Incomplete Integration of All Functions in the Mobile App (mentioned 3 times): Some functionalities available on the web version, like specific data viewing and processing options, are not fully supported on the mobile app.
• Limited Candidate Management Features (mentioned 2 times): Users mention a lack of more advanced candidate management options, such as tagging and transferring candidates directly to talent pools or accounting tools.

Recruiterbox (Trakstar Hire)

Recruiterbox, founded in 2010, is an applicant tracking system based in India that was acquired by Turn/River Capital.

G2 rating: 4.3/5 based on 189 reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.6/5 based on 189 reviews.

Recruiterbox's typical customers are primarily based in the United States (41.64%), with smaller shares in India (27.54%), Bangladesh (16.89%), Canada (5.22%), and the United Kingdom (2.71%). Key industries include Information Technology and Services (15%), Computer Software (8%), Staffing and Recruiting (8%), Hospital & Health Care (8%), and Marketing and Advertising (6%).

According to G2, 62% of customers have 51-1000 employees, 32% have fewer than 50 employees, and 6% have more than 1000. Capterra reviews show 28% of customers with 51-200 employees, and smaller shares across other size categories.

Recruiterbox (Trakstar Hire) Pricing:

Trakstar Hire (formerly Recruiterbox) offers three annual subscription plans: Starter at $199 per month, Pro at $279 per month, and Pro Plus at $309 per month. All plans include unlimited job openings, customizable workflows, and basic to advanced reporting features, with the Pro and Pro Plus tiers adding tools for social media integration, background checks, and HRIS integrations. Trakstar Hire pricing scales based on company size and number of job postings, with enterprise options available for larger recruiting teams, although these come with higher costs and potentially expensive implementation.

Recruiterbox (Trakstar Hire) Pros:

• User-Friendly Interface (mentioned 13 times): Users appreciate the intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical skills.
• Efficient Candidate Management (mentioned 12 times): The platform is praised for its ability to organize and track candidates efficiently, facilitating a streamlined hiring process.
• Excellent Customer Support (mentioned 11 times): Recruiterbox's responsive and helpful customer support team is frequently highlighted as a significant advantage.

Recruiterbox (Trakstar Hire) Cons:

• Learning Curve and Usability Issues (mentioned 5 times): Some users find the platform has a steep learning curve and can be challenging to navigate, especially for larger teams with varying technology experience.
• Limited Reporting and Analytics (mentioned 4 times): Users desire more robust reporting features and advanced analytics for generating insights.
• Integration Limitations (mentioned 3 times): There are challenges with integrating Recruiterbox with other software and platforms, particularly with email syncing and job posting sites.
• Limited Customization and Flexibility (mentioned 3 times): Users note a lack of flexibility in customizing the platform to fit specific hiring processes and the need for more comprehensive customization options.
• User Interface and Experience (mentioned 3 times): The user interface and experience are considered outdated by some, with suggestions for a more modern and intuitive design.
• Communication and Feedback Submission (mentioned 2 times): The process for submitting feedback and viewing comments from other committee members is seen as cumbersome.
• Mobile Accessibility (mentioned 2 times): The absence of a mobile app or mobile-friendly design is noted as a drawback, limiting access for users on the go.
• Email Management and Notifications (mentioned 2 times): Issues with email formatting and the management of email communications within the platform are highlighted.
• Candidate Management and Duplication (mentioned 2 times): Users express concerns about managing duplicate candidate profiles and the desire for better mechanisms to handle repeated applications.
• Price and Value (mentioned 1 time): While not a widespread concern, at least one user mentioned the pricing model as a potential barrier, especially for smaller teams or businesses.

HiringThing

HiringThing, founded in 2012, is an applicant tracking system that raised $5.5 million.

G2 rating: 4.5/5 based on 28 reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.5/5 based on 91 reviews.

HiringThing's typical customers are primarily based in the United States (85.65%), with smaller shares in India (3.39%), the United Kingdom (2.82%), Canada (2.23%), and Egypt (1.67%). Key industries include Information Technology and Services (11%), Human Resources (11%), Transportation/Trucking/Railroad (7%), Staffing and Recruiting (7%), and Health, Wellness and Fitness (4%).

According to G2, 50% of customers have fewer than 50 employees, 42.9% have 51-1000 employees, and 7.1% have more than 1000.

HiringThing Pricing:

HiringThing offers flexible pricing options starting at $22 per month for its services. The basic plans include a Start Plan at $27 per month for up to 2 active jobs, a Standard Plan at $90 per month for up to 5 active jobs, an Evolve Plan at $160 per month for up to 10 active jobs, and a Pro Plan at $310 per month for up to 30 active jobs. Additionally, HiringThing provides a free trial and a month free with annual subscriptions, but no free version is available.

HiringThing Pros:

• Ease of Use and User-Friendly Interface (mentioned 29 times): Users appreciate the intuitive design and simplicity of HiringThing, making it easy for both recruiters and hiring managers to learn and navigate without extensive training.
• Effective Customer Support (mentioned 21 times): The responsive and proactive customer service team is highly valued, with users noting fast replies and helpful guidance through various support channels.
• All-in-One Recruitment Platform (mentioned 18 times): Users find value in the centralized platform that consolidates all recruiting tasks, from posting jobs to managing applicants, into one accessible system.

HiringThing Cons:

• Limited Job Board Integration and Relevance (mentioned 11 times): Users find the job posting capabilities restrictive, especially for niche boards, and desire more flexibility in targeting industry-specific platforms.
• Issues with Integrations (mentioned 10 times): Users report integration challenges with other software, such as HRIS systems and scheduling tools like Microsoft Teams, which results in extra work.
• Simplistic Design and Limited Customization (mentioned 8 times): Some users feel the interface is too basic, with limited customization options, especially in email templates, dashboards, and branding.
• Scheduling and Calendar Limitations (mentioned 7 times): The scheduling feature is seen as insufficient, particularly for multi-person interviews, leading users to rely on external calendar tools.
• Email and Notification Overload (mentioned 6 times): Users cite frequent, unnecessary email updates as overwhelming and wish for more control over notification settings.
• Challenges with Candidate Tracking and Duplication (mentioned 6 times): Users struggle with tracking candidates who apply to multiple positions, with no efficient system to manage these duplicates.
• Slow Updates and System Performance Issues (mentioned 5 times): Some users note that new applicants may take time to appear in searches, and certain functionalities could be slow or prone to issues.
• Lack of Advanced Reporting and Analytics (mentioned 5 times): The platform’s analytics and reporting capabilities are seen as limited, especially for users needing more in-depth insights or demographic tracking.
• Weak Search and Filtering Capabilities (mentioned 4 times): Users find it difficult to search and filter candidates effectively, particularly in larger applicant pools.
• High Cost for Additional Features (mentioned 3 times): Some users feel that additional costs for features or higher-tier plans are excessive for smaller companies, making the tool less economical.

Jobsoid

Jobsoid, founded in 2016, is an applicant tracking system based in India.

G2 rating: 4.4/5 based on 12 reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.4/5 based on 108 reviews.

Jobsoid's typical customers are primarily based in the United States (13.23%), India (12.16%), Portugal (9.86%), Canada (6.48%), and the United Kingdom (5.18%). Key industries include Information Technology and Services (14%), Staffing and Recruiting (10%), Human Resources (10%), Computer Software (8%), and Marketing and Advertising (7%).

According to G2, 40% of customers have 51-1000 employees, while 30% have fewer than 50 employees and 30% have more than 1000. Capterra reviews show 27.8% of customers with 11-50 employees, with smaller shares across other size categories.

Jobsoid Pricing:

Beginner: Free, includes 1 job posting, 1 user account, unlimited candidates, and mobile apps.
Lite: $49/month (annual) or $59/month (monthly), adds 3 job postings, unlimited users, and advanced reporting.
Standard: $99/month (annual) or $119/month (monthly), with 10 job postings, video screening, reference checks, questionnaires, and EEO compliance.
Pro: $249/month (annual) or $299/month (monthly), provides 50 job postings, lead management, campaigns, and recruiter CRM.

Jobsoid Pros:

• Ease of Use and User-Friendly Interface (mentioned 21 times): Users appreciate the simplicity and intuitive design of Jobsoid, making it easy for both HR professionals and hiring managers to navigate and use the platform effectively.
• One-Click Job Posting to Multiple Job Boards (mentioned 16 times): The ability to post jobs across various platforms like Indeed and LinkedIn with a single click is highly valued by users, making the recruitment process faster and more efficient.
• Wide Range of Features and Functionalities (mentioned 15 times): Jobsoid’s comprehensive feature set, including candidate tracking, interview scheduling, and communication tools, is praised for its functionality and usefulness in managing recruitment.

Jobsoid Cons:

• Limited Customization Options (mentioned 9 times): Users note that the platform lacks flexibility in customizing workflows, candidate tracking, and integrations, which would better meet specific organizational needs.
• UI/UX Could Be Improved (mentioned 8 times): The interface design feels outdated or clunky to some users, making it harder to navigate or use effectively.
• Inefficient Candidate Search and Filtering (mentioned 7 times): Users find the candidate search and filtering options limited or inefficient, with requests for more robust filtering capabilities, such as by salary or experience.
• Mobile App Limitations (mentioned 6 times): The mobile app has limited functionality and stability, making it challenging for users to manage tasks effectively on the go.
• Customer Support Challenges (mentioned 5 times): Some users report issues with customer support, such as slow response times or difficulty in reaching representatives, especially due to time zone differences.
• Learning Curve for New Users (mentioned 5 times): For some users, the platform's variety of features requires training and a trial-and-error approach, which can be challenging for inexperienced users.
• Data Storage and Connectivity Issues (mentioned 4 times): Occasional connectivity issues and limited data storage capacity have been noted, impacting users’ ability to access candidate data seamlessly.
• Lack of Integration with Certain Platforms (mentioned 4 times): Users mention missing integration options, such as with LinkedIn 1-click apply and Naukri, limiting their candidate reach and process efficiency.
• Slow Application or Candidate Processing (mentioned 4 times): Some users experience delays in candidate processing, particularly when retrieving archived profiles or opening certain document formats.
• Limited Free Version Capabilities (mentioned 3 times): Users on the free version note restrictions, such as limited job postings, which can be restrictive for small teams or businesses testing the platform.

BrightMove

BrightMove, founded in 2005, is an applicant tracking system.

G2 rating: 3.6/5 based on 13 reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.3/5 based on 274 reviews.

BrightMove's typical customers are primarily based in the United States (89.85%), with smaller shares in India (5.32%) and the Philippines (4.84%). Key industries include Staffing and Recruiting (7%), Human Resources (7%), Health, Wellness and Fitness (7%), Information Technology and Services (7%), and Insurance (7%).

According to G2, 60% of customers have fewer than 50 employees, 30% have 51-1000 employees, and 10% have more than 1000.

BrightMove Pricing:

BrightMove offers tailored plans across various sectors, each starting with a Standard package at around $125–$225 per user/month, depending on sector (Staffing, RPO, Franchise, Corporate Recruiting). The Advanced and Enterprise plans are custom-priced, including added features like lead generation, analytics, branding, API support, and integrations (e.g., Indeed, ZipRecruiter). For PEO services, BrightMove also provides customized billing to align with client needs.

BrightMove Pros:

• Ease of Use and User-Friendly Interface (mentioned 14 times): Users highlight the simplicity and intuitive design of BrightMove, requiring minimal training for everyday tasks such as candidate submissions and job postings.
• Effective Customer Service and Support (mentioned 11 times): The customer support team is highly responsive and helpful, providing efficient assistance through live chat and phone, making it easy to resolve issues quickly.
• Customization and Flexibility (mentioned 9 times): BrightMove offers customizable features, including reporting and workflows, allowing users to tailor the system to their specific recruiting needs.

BrightMove Cons:

• Limited Reporting Capabilities (mentioned 8 times): Users find the reporting feature lacking in flexibility and ease of use, making it difficult to generate custom reports without additional support or training.
• Complex Setup and Customization (mentioned 6 times): Setting up and customizing BrightMove, particularly for triggers and workflows, can be challenging for users who are not technically inclined, requiring significant time and effort.
• Duplicate Candidate Management (mentioned 5 times): The system struggles with duplicate candidate profiles, lacking a straightforward way to manage or merge duplicates, which complicates tracking candidates across multiple positions.
• Inconsistent Customer Service Quality (mentioned 5 times): Although customer support is generally responsive, some users have experienced delays, limited availability during certain hours, and challenges in resolving complex issues efficiently.
• Email and Calendar Integration Limitations (mentioned 4 times): Users express a need for better integration with tools like Outlook and Gmail, which would streamline communication without needing to leave the platform.
• System Glitches and Stability Issues (mentioned 4 times): Occasional technical glitches, slowdowns, and outages disrupt user experience and efficiency, although these issues are generally resolved quickly by the support team.
• Confusing Search and Filter Functionality (mentioned 4 times): The search tool, especially for internal job IDs and specific candidate criteria, can be confusing and inefficient, requiring improvements for more accurate and straightforward filtering.
• User Interface Complexity (mentioned 3 times): While BrightMove offers extensive customization, the abundance of options can make the interface feel cluttered and overwhelming, especially for new users.
• Limited Automation for Job Postings (mentioned 3 times): Some users would like more streamlined job posting options and better integration with external job boards, as current automation options can be limited or cumbersome.
• Basic Candidate Experience Limitations (mentioned 2 times): The lack of automated communication features like auto-texting and candidate notifications for new job postings limits engagement with applicants, impacting the candidate experience.

Jobtoolz

Jobtoolz, founded in 2016, is an applicant tracking system based in Belgium that acquired HireHive.

G2 rating: 4/5 based on 1 reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.3/5 based on 70 reviews.

Jobtoolz's typical customers are primarily based in Belgium (70.16%), with smaller shares in the Netherlands (11.21%), the United States (7.97%), France (5.45%), and Spain (2.23%). Key industries include Construction (9%), Automotive (7%), Hospital & Health Care (6%), Human Resources (6%), and Food & Beverages (4%).

Capterra reviews show 37.1% of customers with 51-200 employees, 22.9% with 201-500 employees, and smaller shares across other size categories.

Jobtoolz Pricing:

Jobtoolz offers a pricing range based on the number of active job vacancies, starting at $231 per month for 1 vacancy and scaling up to $1,234 per month for 100 vacancies.

Jobtoolz Pros:

• Ease of Use and User-Friendly Interface (mentioned 25 times): Users highlight the intuitive design and simplicity of Jobtoolz, making it accessible and easy for HR teams and hiring managers to navigate without extensive training.
• Efficient Candidate Tracking and Follow-Up (mentioned 15 times): The platform’s ability to provide organized, easy-to-follow candidate tracking and seamless communication aids in efficient management of the recruitment pipeline.
• Employer Branding Tools (mentioned 8 times): Jobtoolz supports employer branding by enabling companies to create visually appealing, professional job portals without substantial investment in web development.

Jobtoolz Cons:

• Limited Features and Functionality (mentioned 12 times): Users noted that some needed features are currently unavailable, such as triggered actions for automated email responses and filters for archiving candidates without rejecting them.
• Customization Limitations (mentioned 10 times): The platform lacks customization options in areas like web page configuration, notifications, and the inability to fully integrate with custom domains, which restricts some users’ branding and flexibility.
• Search and Filtering Challenges (mentioned 8 times): The search functionality was highlighted as needing improvement, with some users finding it cumbersome and noting slow loading times when searching or retrieving candidates.
• Platform Performance and Speed Issues (mentioned 6 times): Users reported occasional slowness and system lags, particularly when navigating between candidates or waiting for the system to load, which affects efficiency.
• Overlapping and Redundant Emails (mentioned 5 times): Some users found the email notifications excessive, noting that the system sometimes generates too many notifications per candidate action, leading to inbox overload.
• Interface Complexity (mentioned 5 times): While overall user-friendly, some users found certain areas of the interface confusing, especially when navigating between different modules or managing multiple job postings.
• Reporting and Data Insights (mentioned 4 times): Users mentioned the limited reporting options and the lack of specific KPIs, such as recruitment costs, which restricts data-driven decision-making.
• Bugs and Technical Issues (mentioned 4 times): Minor bugs, such as visual glitches and occasional re-emergence of solved issues, were mentioned, though users noted that Jobtoolz is actively addressing these.
• Interim Module and Candidate Sharing Limitations (mentioned 3 times): The platform’s interim module and candidate-sharing options were seen as lacking, with users noting inefficiencies in sharing job postings with multiple agencies simultaneously.
• Initial Setup Complexity (mentioned 3 times): Setting up the platform, particularly creating recruitment processes for each job, was mentioned as time-consuming, though users acknowledged the necessity of this initial investment in building a unique jobsite.

RESUMate

RESUMate, founded in 1988, is an applicant tracking system.

G2 rating: 4/5 based on 1 reviews.

Capterra rating: 4.6/5 based on 72 reviews.

RESUMate's typical customers are entirely based in the United States. Key industries include Staffing and Recruiting (27%), Media Production (9%), Hospital & Health Care (9%), Medical Practice (9%), and Information Technology and Services (9%).

According to G2 reviews, 100% of customers have fewer than 50 employees.

RESUMate Pricing:

Cloud:

RESUMate Cloud: $49/user, cloud database without direct Microsoft Office integration.
RESUMate Cloud-Office: $79/user, includes Microsoft Office tools accessible from various devices. Both cloud options have a $49 setup fee.
Desktop:

Single User: $495.
Additional users range from $690 (two users) to $956 (five users or more), allowing local Wi-Fi or wired network sharing.

RESUMate Pros:

• Excellent Customer Service and Support (mentioned 19 times): Users consistently praise the responsive, knowledgeable support team, who promptly assist with any issues and provide valuable training sessions, contributing to an overall positive experience.
• Ease of Use and User-Friendly Interface (mentioned 17 times): The tool is intuitive and easy to navigate, making it suitable even for users who are less tech-savvy, and helping users streamline the recruitment process efficiently.
• Powerful and Flexible Search Capabilities (mentioned 15 times): RESUMate’s search features are highlighted as robust and customizable, allowing recruiters to easily find candidates and match them with job requirements.

RESUMate Cons:

• Outdated User Interface and Color Scheme (mentioned 5 times): Users find the design outdated, with a monotone gray color scheme that could be refreshed to improve the overall user experience.
• Connectivity and Cloud Issues (mentioned 4 times): Some users experience connectivity problems, especially with multi-device setups, requiring frequent reconnections, which can be frustrating.
• Learning Curve and Complexity (mentioned 4 times): While powerful, RESUMate’s extensive features can be challenging to learn, and users may need time or training to navigate all functions effectively.
• Data Entry Requirements and Lack of Automation (mentioned 3 times): The system requires manual data entry, and users report a lack of automation options, such as email templates or data parsing from social media or job boards.
• Limited Report Customization and Functionality (mentioned 3 times): Users feel that reporting options are limited, lacking in customization and advanced functionality that would make the tool more versatile.
• Data Migration and Conversion Challenges (mentioned 2 times): Converting data from other systems to RESUMate can be problematic, with limited support for data migration, making it difficult for users with established databases.
• Initial Setup Complexity (mentioned 2 times): Setting up RESUMate can be time-consuming, particularly for establishing industry-specific tables and indexed searches.
• Memory and Compatibility Issues (mentioned 2 times): Users report occasional memory limitations and compatibility issues with specific functions, reducing the effectiveness of certain features.
• Limited Social Media and Job Board Integration (mentioned 2 times): Users would like better integration with social media and job boards to streamline data pulling and candidate tracking.
• Basic Functionality Only, No Advanced Features (mentioned 1 time): Users who need advanced recruiting tools find RESUMate’s functionality somewhat basic, lacking features like candidate-job matching directly from profiles.